Robin Swann Paul Givan Ireland regional Coronavirus Robin Swann Paul Givan Ireland

Discussion needed before lifting restrictions in Northern Ireland - Swann

Reading now: 143
www.rte.ie

Stormont's Minister for Health has said he needs to talk to other ministers before decisions can be taken about further relaxation of Northern Ireland's Covid-19 restrictions.

Robin Swann had sought legal advice about whether he could unilaterally make changes in the absence of the Executive. It collapsed when DUP First Minister Paul Givan resigned in protest last week over the Northern Ireland Protocol.

Individual ministers have been able to continue in their respective roles. On Monday, Mr Swann said the Covid trends showed the time was right to consider lifting some restrictions.

Measures like mandatory face masks in retail and on public transport and Covid passports for nightclubs are still in place. This afternoon, he said he has received the "detailed legal advice" on factors which need to be considered before further changes could be made without executive approval. "This advice is now being given careful consideration and it is my intention to engage with ministerial colleagues," he said in a statement.

Read more on rte.ie
The website covid-19.rehab is an aggregator of news from open sources. The source is indicated at the beginning and at the end of the announcement. You can send a complaint on the news if you find it unreliable.

Related News

Guelph school board’s mask mandate to end on March 21 with provincial rules - globalnews.ca
globalnews.ca
37%
198
Guelph school board’s mask mandate to end on March 21 with provincial rules
Lecce defends end date for Ontario school mask mandate amid calls for more time That resolution for all students was passed by the board just days after the province announced it would only require students from grades 4 to 12 to wear masks.The province then extended the order to include grades 1 through 3 in August 2021.On Wednesday, the Ontario government announced masking would no longer be required in schools as of March 21.In a statement on Thursday, Upper Grand said it “consulted with several parties to determine next steps and receive clarity” on whether it could still mandate masks in school.“Those consultations concluded that once the province lifts its masking requirements, the school board does not have the independent authority to prescribe public health measures in response to an infectious disease, such as COVID-19,” the board said.“Further, boards of trustees do not have the authority to impose restrictions that the Ministry has directed must be revoked.”Changes to the masking protocol will be on the agenda during a board meeting that had already been scheduled for March 22. Guelph’s top doc to lift own mask mandate put in place months before provincewide policy The board of trustees will have to follow the direction of the government and bring forward a motion to officially rescind the board resolution from August 2022.“We know that the topic of masks can be a divisive one,” director of education Peter Sovran and chair of the board of trustees Linda Busuttil said in a joint statement.“We want to stress that students, staff and visitors are still welcome to wear masks in our schools, and this is their choice.
Tom Wolf - Patricia Maccullough - Divided court explains choice of new Pennsylvania congressional map - fox29.com - state Pennsylvania - city Harrisburg, state Pennsylvania
fox29.com
82%
837
Divided court explains choice of new Pennsylvania congressional map
HARRISBURG, Pa. - All seven Pennsylvania Supreme Court justices issued opinions Wednesday regarding their 4-3 vote last month to pick a new map of the state's congressional districts, disclosing the majority relied partially on how fair the various proposals would be to the two major parties."We conclude that consideration of partisan fairness, when selecting a plan among several that meet traditional core criteria, is necessary to ensure that a congressional plan is reflective of and responsive to the partisan preferences of the commonwealth's voters," wrote Chief Justice Max Baer, joined by three fellow Democrats.He said tools that evaluate partisan fairness can help "avoid vote dilution based on political affiliation."The majority also rejected the argument that the 17 districts, each with nearly 765,000 voters, could not vary by as much as two voters apiece, as does the map they picked.After Democratic Gov. Tom Wolf and the Republican majority state House and Senate deadlocked on drawing new lines for 17 congressional districts, reflecting the loss of a seat in the 2020 census, the job was left to the courts.The state's population increases over the past decade have been concentrated in the southeast, a stronghold for Democrats, while losses have occurred in the more rural and Republican areas of Pennsylvania's northern tier and western counties.A Republican Commonwealth Court judge, Patricia McCullough, recommended the justices go with the GOP-favored map that Wolf had vetoed.
DMCA