Hsiu-Li Wang saint Luke city Waterloo city Cambridge hospital covid-19 death Hsiu-Li Wang saint Luke city Waterloo city Cambridge

COVID-19: 4 new deaths reported in Waterloo Region as hospitals care for 91 patients

Reading now: 193
globalnews.ca

COVID-19-related deaths on Wednesday, raising the death toll in the area to 381, including the 22 victims announced so far in February.“Today we are reporting four deaths in our community related to COVID-19: one female in her 90s, 2 females in their 80s, and one male in his 80s,” Dr.

Hsiu-Li Wang, medical officer of health, stated.“I wish to express my deep sympathy to the families of these individuals.” Free COVID rapid antigen tests now available at Ontario grocery stores, pharmacies at one-box limit All four were residents of long-term-care homes in the area, which each have been under outbreak status for over a month.

The facilities include three in Cambridge: PeopleCare Hilltop Manor, St Andrews Terrace, and Saint Luke’s Place as well as Chartwell Westmount in Kitchener.There are 46 active COVID-19 outbreaks in the region including 23 in long-term-care or retirement homes, 11 in congregate settings and 12 in area hospitals.The three area hospitals are also currently housing 91 patients suffering from COVID-19, including 22 who are in need of intensive care.Waterloo Public Health also announced another 101 new positive tests for the coronavirus on Wednesday, lifting the total number of cases in the area to 29,308.This drops the rolling seven-day average number of new daily cases to 102.

A week ago, that number was 154.7, but the testing numbers are considered an underestimation of actual community caseload since changes to testing availability have decreased the veracity of the totals.Another 440 people were also deemed to have recovered from the virus, lifting the total number of resolved cases to 37,801.This leaves the area with 1,098 active cases, down from 1,175 on Tuesday and 1,527 a week earlier.On the flip.

Read more on globalnews.ca
The website covid-19.rehab is an aggregator of news from open sources. The source is indicated at the beginning and at the end of the announcement. You can send a complaint on the news if you find it unreliable.

Related News

Mahinda Yapa Abeywardena - Supreme Court delivers PTA Bill determination to Parliament - newsfirst.lk - Sri Lanka
newsfirst.lk
47%
158
Supreme Court delivers PTA Bill determination to Parliament
COLOMBO (News 1st); Sri Lanka’s Supreme Court has delivered its determination to the Parliament on the Prevention of Terrorism (Temporary Provisions) (Amendment) Bill.The determination read out by Speaker Mahinda Yapa Abeywardena is as follows:Clause 2 of the Bill is NOT inconsistent with any provision of the constitution.Clause 3 of the Bill cannot be enacted into law unless the number of votes cast in favor amounts not less than 2/3 of the whole number of members, including those not present, as per the constitution.The Supreme Court is however of the view that if the provisions of Clause 3 of the bill are amended as set out in the determination of the Supreme Court, it would ease to be inconsistent with any provision of the constitution.Clause 4 of the Bill, the Supreme Court states that be that as it may, the learned Additional Solicitor General had informed the court that the Attorney General would be advising the Minister to insert article 141 into the body of the proposed section 10 in Clause 4 of the Bill and the Minister would move that amendment at the Parliament Committee stage to address the concerns of the petitioners.Clause 5 of the Bill, for the reason mentioned in the determination of the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court holds that Clause 5 is NOT inconsistent with any provision of the constitution.Clause 6 of the Bill, the Supreme Court holds that it cannot inquire into pronounce upon or in any manner called into question, the validity of section 11 of the PTA on any grounds whatsoever, in terms of article 83 of the constitution.Clause 10 of the Bill, the Supreme Court holds that if amended as set out in the determination of the Supreme Court would cease to be inconsistent with any provision of the
DMCA